Quantcast
Channel: Indian Defence News
Viewing all 86928 articles
Browse latest View live

The Problem With Pakistan’s Continuing Support of Terrorism in Afghanistan and India

$
0
0

A growing number of Afghans now believe that Pakistani support for Islamic terrorists attacking Afghanistan is more of a problem than Islamic terror groups already inside Afghanistan. This includes the Taliban, al Qaeda and ISIL (Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant). Going public with this sort of thing is another after effect of the July 23 ISIL suicide bombing in Kabul that killed over 80 people. President Ghani and senior Afghan (and American) intel officials agree that this attack was only possible because of Pakistani support for ISIL. Thus Afghanistan now believes Pakistan is the biggest threat to Afghanistan because Pakistan makes the drug trade possible and supports Islamic terror groups, in addition to the Taliban, inside Afghanistan. Pakistan denies all this but most Afghans and a growing number of Pakistanis believe the accusations are true. 

The Afghan government had long been complaining to Pakistan about the continued presence of Islamic terrorist sanctuaries in Pakistan. These complaints were largely ignored and since 2014 the Pakistanis have been boasting about their military operation to eliminate the sanctuary in the northwest (North Waziristan). But the Afghans knew that the operation in North Waziristan was mainly about Islamic terrorists who carried out attacks against the Pakistani government. The Islamic terrorists who operated against Afghanistan were largely untouched. In early 2016 there were more and more spectacular attacks inside Afghanistan by Islamic terrorists who could be traced back to Pakistan. A lot of the evidence was collected by Afghan special operations troops. Pakistan continued to deny responsibility and the Afghan government quietly agreed to an American plan that would go after the Taliban and other Islamic terrorists operating against Afghanistan where they were. This led to the first American UAV missile attack in southwest Pakistan, which killed the head of the Afghan Taliban as he returned to Quetta after visiting Iran. President Ghani has offered to provide Pakistan with the addresses of Afghan Taliban leaders who have been living (mainly in the city of Quetta) since 2001.

Afghan and American intel officials agree that most (about 70 percent) of the ISIL men in Afghanistan are Pakistani, mainly former members of the Pakistani Taliban seeking a more hardcore group to work with. Since 2015 ISIL has been trying to establish a base area in eastern Afghanistan (mainly in Nangarhar province) but that has led to constant skirmishing with Pakistani Taliban hiding out there. The local tribes are also largely hostile to ISIL and all this has provided better intel for the security forces on what ISIL is up to and exactly where they are and who they are. Some of the tribes used their own militias to fight ISIL but more often just helpe set up defenses to keep ISIL out. This cooperation (and information) led to more effective and frequent American air strikes and raids by Afghan troops and American commandos and hundreds of ISIL men have been killed and many more wounded. Many of the wounded desert and there are fewer new volunteers. Cut off from Afghan recruits it makes sense that many of the thousand or so ISIL personnel still active in Afghanistan are from Pakistan. So are many other Islamic terrorists who operate in eastern Afghanistan. But Afghan intelligence believes the Pakistani intelligence (ISI) is now deliberately helping ISIL recruit in Pakistan as long as the recruits go to Afghanistan. ISIL is barely hanging on in Afghanistan and is largely absent in Pakistan. ISIL is not dead in Afghanistan but it isn’t growing much either. 

Kashmir

India blames Pakistan for the sharp increase in Islamic terror activity in Kashmir this year. Pakistan was accused of supporting young Moslems in Kashmir to join Pakistani backed terror groups. That led to a popular (especially on social media) young (21) Kashmiri Islamic terrorist (Burhan Wani) being found and killed by police on July 8th. This led to an outbreak of massive, and often violent protests that have left sixty dead and over 6,000 wounded so far. Burhan Wani was seen as someone who could revive Hizbul Mujahideen (HM), which was once the most powerful Islamic terror group in Indian Kashmir. HM has been fading away since 2010 as more of its leaders were killed or captured and few replacements showed up. HM is unique in that it came to be dominated by Indian Kashmiris and resisted control by Pakistan. While still receiving personnel and other aid from Pakistan, HM was more sensitive to Kashmiri needs and desires, not what Pakistani foreign policy demanded. As a result, when the Kashmiri population turned against Islamic terrorism after 2001 HM began to decline but still retained more local support than the groups that were basically Pakistani inventions. Thus HM maintained its position as the major Islamic terror group in Kashmir because increased Indian success at border security hurt the groups more dependent on personnel and aid from Pakistan. 

Pakistan has been sponsoring Islamic terrorism in Indian Kashmir since the 1980s and terrorism deaths in Kashmir peaked in 2001. By 2011 India had reduced Islamic terrorist related violence in Kashmir by over 95 percent from that 2001 peak. Despite that Pakistan continued recruiting, training and sending Islamic terrorists into India. For the first four months of 2016 the Islamic terrorist violence in Kashmir was running at the same levels as 2015. But in the last few months there has been a major escalation and now Islamic terrorist deaths in Kashmir are 50 percent higher than the same period in 2015. 

Over 50,000 have died in Islamic militant violence in Kashmir since the 1980s. This ruined the thriving tourism based economy of Kashmir, and eventually turned the largely Moslem population against the terrorists. While the Islamic terrorists have failed to drive India out of Kashmir, they have managed, since the 1970s, to drive most (95 percent) of the Hindus from the Kashmir Valley. But many Hindu shrines, some over 3,000 years old, remain. Thousands of Hindus return each year to pray at these shrines, and the Moslems have begun agitating to restrict access to these shrines. The most militant Moslems want the shrines destroyed. Although Moslem armies first entered this region a thousand years ago, the struggle between Islam and much more ancient Hindu religion continues. 

Maoists

For India Leftist rebels (Maoists) continue to be a bigger problem than Islamic terrorism. The difference is the Maoists have no outside support while the Islamic terrorists have long, and very visibly been based in Pakistan. Nevertheless the Maoists this year are reversing several years of decline (in Maoist related violence). In 2015 there were 251 deaths related to Maoist violence, the lowest level in over a decade. But so far this year it looks like Maoist violence will nearly double, going back to levels not seen since 2011. This is mainly because of the failure to deal with toe corruption that kept the Maoists popular enough for decades to keep them going. 

Bangladesh

In Bangladesh Islamic terrorist related deaths for 2016 are headed for triple the 42 for all of 2015. That was down from 60 in 2014 and a record 379 in 2013. The 2013 surge was 69 percent of all Islamic terrorist deaths since 2005 and a sign that Islamic terrorism continues to have a difficult time getting a foothold in Bangladesh. Actually most of the terrorism related deaths were political rather than religious but in the last few years’ Islamic terrorism has gotten a lot more attention in the news. The government also blames rival political parties for aiding the Islamic terrorists but has not been able to produce evidence the police can act on. One thing that may reverse the trend is the massive popular and government reaction to the July 1st terrorist attack on a popular café in Dhaka that left 22 dead (including 20 foreigners). While ISIL took credit for the July 1 attack the government believes it was the work of local group JMB (Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh). JMB has been around since 1998 and wants to turn Bangladesh into a religious dictatorship. JMB turned to violence in 2005 and has been at war with the government ever since. Bangladesh also blames Pakistan for supporting Islamic terrorism within Bangladesh. This goes back to a 1971 uprising in Bangladesh that led to a war between Pakistan and India. Many Pakistani military leaders see this 1971 loss as a major reason for Pakistani obsession with India. Not only was the Pakistani army decisively defeated in 1971, but the country lost much territory (which actively sought to secede and became Bangladesh). Former Pakistani military commander and dictator (via another coup) Pervez Musharraf admitted in late 2014 that he started the 1999 Kargil border war with India as another attempt to avenge the defeat (and loss of Bangladesh) in 1971. Pakistani officers (and many other Pakistanis) have always attributed the loss of Bangladesh to an Indian conspiracy with traitorous politicians in Bangladesh (that used to be called East Pakistan). Bangladesh calls that conspiracy theory absurd and that the real reason for the rebellion was corruption and incompetent government imposed by troops from “West Pakistan” (which after 1971 was all that remained of pre-1971 Pakistan).



South China Sea Ruling: India Takes A Stand

$
0
0
U.S. Carrier Strike group in the South China Sea Region

by Darshana M Baruah

India's stance is not about China's rise or a reaction to Chinese actions, but a necessary step to lend its voice on a matter of principle critical to peace and stability in the region.

The South China Sea dispute verdict has been delivered in favour of the Philippines, and the infamous 'nine dash line' now has no basis in international law.

Without taking sides on the dispute, India has chosen to take a stand on the principle and application of international law, issuing a statement that said: 'As a State Party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), India urges all parties to show utmost respect for the UNCLOS, which establishes the international legal order of the seas and oceans.' The statement indicates that New Delhi recognises the ruling from the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) and will uphold it.

In the days leading up to the ruling, there was much debate in New Delhi as to whether India should take a stand on this issue at all. Choosing to stay quiet on the matter was never an option, but India could have issued a statement to the effect of 'all parties should resolve the matter in a peaceful manner'. India's choice wasn't about picking sides, but about voicing concerns at a defining moment which could very well form the foundations of a new security architecture in the region. The course of China's subsequent actions and responses from around the region will set a precedent for future disputes.

India's decision to take a stand, and the tone of the message, was calculated. The statement focuses more on the need to respect international law; it is not a position on China or the Philippines, or on the South China Sea for that matter.

India is not a party to the disputes, but has higher stakes in this matter than most acknowledge. Apart from an economic interest (with approximately 55% of India's trade transiting through those waters), New Delhi's political and strategic interests are very much in play. If India remained silent on the matter, it would also have undermined its past decision to accept the Tribunal's award in favour of Bangladesh in a maritime dispute.

As an aspiring leading power, India should aim to shape the regional political discourse. It must lend its voice in creating the foundations of a new security architecture in the Asia Pacific. The Act East policy demands an increase in Indian presence in those waters, both economically and politically, and India has to deliver for its ASEAN friends, especially at defining moments like this. There is also the fact that in 2012 China ignored India's presence in an oil exploration block in Vietnam's EEZ and put it up for international bidding unilaterally, undermining both India's economic interests and Delhi's relationship with Vietnam. China has tried to create unilateral norms in waters that are critical to India's engagement with the entire region.

Given China's vow to disregard the ruling, subsequent developments could establish new norms and practices that would clearly affect India's strategic and political interests.

China refused to participate in the proceedings brought by the Philippines, claiming both the Philippines and the Tribunal have, by entertaining this dispute, 'abused' UNCLOS provisions. China is right in claiming that the PCA has no jurisdiction in deciding disputes concerning the issue of sovereignty, but the Philippine claims focus primarily on issues pertaining to the interpretation of UNCLOS and only incidentally touch upon questions of sovereignty. Notwithstanding the Tribunal's earlier award on the legality of its exercise of jurisdiction, China continues to mischaracterise the dispute as one involving questions of sovereignty. Though the award binds China, Beijing has called for the ruling to be ignored, fully aware the Tribunal has no independent enforcement mechanism or powers.

In its effort to render the judgment void, China has been working hard to convince the world the ruling is invalid. China's frantic campaign against the award is at odds with its public calm and disregard. This disregard toward an international tribunal makes a serious dent in its mantra emphasising a 'peaceful rise'.

China could very well feel pressured to react in a manner that will visibly strengthen its position on the invalidity of the award. Possible actions could be a withdrawal from UNCLOS (unlikely); establishing an Air Defence Identification Zone over the South China Sea (which would be disregarded by regional players); and drawing baselines around some of the islands or building new islands entirely (which would be met with legal and diplomatic protests from other claimants).

China is also likely to increase its presence (militarily and otherwise) on its artificial islands and disrupt movement of Vietnamese and Philippines military and civilian maritime vessels. It will, of course, continue to challenge every freedom of navigation operation in the area.

Whatever actions China takes, the developments following the verdict may very well set the stage for new norms and practices affecting India's engagements with the region. Not responding to the verdict could have been disastrous for New Delhi. India's stance is not about China's rise or a reaction to Chinese actions, but a necessary step to lend its voice on a matter of principle critical to peace and stability in the region, to uphold international law and appear a credible contributor to regional security.


China To Modernize Tank Battalion With New Battle Tank

$
0
0

BEIJING: Rapidly modernizing its military, China plans to make its third generation battle tank, the Type-96B as the pillar of its tank fleet, replacing most of its old models, official media reported today.

Gao Zhuo, a military observer in Shanghai who has close contacts with the People's Liberation Army, told state-run China Daily that the excellent capabilities of the Type-96B qualify it to be the backbone of China's tank force.

"The Type-96B is the strongest variant of the Type-96 family and is truly an advanced, third-generation main battle tank," he said.

The PLA will use it to replace the old tanks such as the Type-59 and Type-69 models.

His remarks came as the Type-96B delivered impressive performances in the ongoing Masters of Automobile and Tank Hardware competition, also known as the Tank Biathlon, at the Alabino training range in Moscow, the Daily reported.

The PLA sent several Type-96B tanks to take part in the tank competition, the most watched part of the Russia-hosted International Army Games.

The eight-day individual part of the competition, which involved 54 teams from 17 countries, ended on Sunday, with the Chinese delegation scoring the highest.

All of the PLA's three teams were to compete in the semifinal that started yesterday.

By the end of last year, the Chinese military had more than 7,000 tanks in active service, including about 2,000 Type-96s and Type-96As, as well as about 600 Type-99s and Type-99As, so the majority of the PLA armoured force is still equipped with tanks made several decades ago, according to foreign military analysts.

The tank modernisation is part of overhaul of PLA's army, airforce and navy which are undergoing massive modernisation and organisational restructuring initiated by Chinese President Xi Jinping.

PLA which has the world's largest army comprising of 2.3 million personnel has an annual budget over USD 145 billion, next only to US defence budget.

Huang Guozhi, senior editor at Modern Weaponry magazine, said that despite the fact that Type-99 series tanks are more advanced, their high price and limited production capacity mean that it's unrealistic for the PLA to purchase and deploy them on a large scale.

"Therefore, the Type-96B, with a better price and satisfactory capabilities, is very attractive to the Chinese and foreign militaries. It is the best option for the PLA to modernise its armoured forces," he said.

According to an article posted by China North Industries Group Corp on its WeChat social media account, the Type-96B-compared with its predecessors in the Type-96 family-has a high-performance 125 mm smoothbore gun, an improved, more powerful engine, newly developed transmission gear and a state-of-the-art fire-control system.

Yu Shuo, a tank researcher in Beijing, said the Type-96B is among the latest achievements by the nation's land arms industry.

He suggested that too much emphasis should not be placed on the results of the Tank Biathlon, as the experience gained is more important to the PLA.


PM Should Appeal To Kashmiris From The Heart, Not The Lips: Congress

$
0
0

NEW DELHI: Congress today raised questions over Prime Minister Narendra Modi's remarks about 'insaniyat', 'jamhooriyat' and 'Kashmiriyat' and said appeal should go out to Kashmiris from the "heart" rather than "lips" only to enable "integration of minds and heart".

As the Rajya Sabha took up a discussion on the prevailing situation in Kashmir, Leader of Opposition Ghulam Nabi Azad pitched for sending an all-party delegation to the valley besides an appeal by Parliament for end to violence which is being witnessed there for the last 33 days.

"We should appeal for peace and tranquility from here for better future of Kashmir. This kind of unison voice should go from Parliament. That apart, an all-party delegation should go there," the Congress leader said, adding the announcement regarding it should be made immediately as the session is coming to an end in two days.

Initiating the discussion, Azad said criticised the Prime Minister for his "delayed" comments on the Kashmir situation and said even those were made at a rally in Madhya Pradesh rather than in Parliament.

"We are discussing the Kashmir issue for the fourth time.

The Prime Minister should come. The Prime Minister chose Madhya Pradesh to speak on Kashmir. He did not come to this House," he said, adding "Since when has Madhya Pradesh become the capital of the country?"

Azad took a swipe on Modi regarding his statement on 'Insaniyat (humanity), Jamhooriyat (democracy) and Kashmriyat, saying such statements only suited former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

"Such words sound weird if it comes from someone who does not believe in them," he said.

The former Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir said such words should come from the "heart" and not only from the lips.

Referring to the oft-repeated assertion that "Kashmir is integral part of India", Azad said there should also be "integration of minds and hearts".

"...we are not feeling the love and affection, pain and agony, else the statement would not have come from Madhya Pradesh," the Congress leader said in an apparent reference to Modi's comments made at a rally yesterday.

"If it comes from the heart, it will reach Kashmir. It is mere lip-service and hence will not reach Kashmir," he said.

Azad said while Modi keeps sitting in his room in Parliament since morning to evening, he did not make any statement on Kashmir during the past three discussions on the issue in the House.

Azad said violence has increased in the valley ever since BJP has come to power in alliance with PDP, remarks which triggered a brief uproar as ruling party members reacted sharply. He said successive governments have fought against militancy in the valley, but "perhaps you give statements for votes. You have only been indulging in fuelling the fire and not dousing it. Since the day you came to power, Kashmir is on fire...I don't want to go into reasons".

As members of the treasury benches objected to it leading to an uproar, Finance Minister and Leader of the House Arun Jaitley said the situation in Kashmir is "sensitive" and "therefore it is imperative, as far as possible, we speak in one voice".

He urged members from all sides not to touch historical issues where "we have difference of opinion.. This is not the occasion to discuss those issues.. Members should speak from the national point of view.

The Congress leader from the troubled state asserted that while there is an issue of separatism, "Kashmir is not communal, it is secular. There is a difference between seperatism and communalism."

Highlighting that Kashmir is a "complex issue", Azad said politics comes first, economic development at second place followed by employment.

Taking a dig at the Prime Minister, Azad said, "He tweets if something happens in Africa. Even if something happens in our enemy country, Pakistan, he issues condemnation. It is not wrong to show sympathy if humanity is hurt anywhere in the world. But in our own country, when the 'Crown of India' is burning, does the heat not reach...he should have spoken."

Citing media reports, he said Modi spoke on Kashmir on insistance of Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti. "Had the CM not spoken. Even today, PM would not have spoken," he added.

Referring to Modi's comment that all Indians love Kashmir, the Congress leader said, "One should not love Kashmir for its beauty and nature alone. One should love people out there as well."

"Love the people who live there. Love the children who lost their vision due to pellet injuries...," he said while insisting on a political solution.

Talking about the 33-day-old unrest, Azad said things are not flowing from democracy but through the barrel of "guns, pellet guns".

He said there has been curfew for the last 33 days and thousands of people including civilians and security forces have been injured in the violence. The problem in Kashmir is not a "normal law and order issue" like in any other state, Azad said, while underlining that the Centre should come forward to help the state as it is dependent on New Delhi for everything, including security, development and even salaries.

While talking about the continuing problem of Kashmir, he said a lot needs to be done to strengthen the relationship between the Centre and the state.

He wondered what happened to reports of various committees, including one headed by late Justice Shabir Ahmed, which made several recommendations for strengthening the integration.

"The report was submitted in 2009-10. Still nothing has been done," he said.

Earlier, Azad associated himself with the views of BSP leader Satish Mishra on Dalit issue and took a jibe on the Prime Minister for making statement on the issue from Telangana and not in Parliament.


PM Modi, Jaya and Putin dedicate Kudankulam Nuclear Plant Unit-I

$
0
0

TIRUNELVELI: Nearly three decades after the first contract was inked between India and Russia — a period that saw the collapse of the Soviet Union and the resultant change in world order, and as many as 10 governments at the Centre — Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa jointly dedicated Unit 1 of the KudankulamNuclear Power Plant on Wednesday afternoon.

Modi terms the Kudankulam plant another strategic partnership with Russia

Prime Minister Narendra Modi said the commissioning of the first 1,000 MW unit in Kudankulam is a mark of another strategic partnership between India and Russia. Speaking on the occasion of dedicating the first 1,000 MW unit built with Russian equipment, Modi said it is only the start of the collaboration in the nuclear field between the two nations.

Jayalalithaa Issues Safety Concerns

“The smooth commercial operation of this project overcoming many obstacles – economic, political and social, global, national and local – stands testimony to the unwavering commitment to the project of the governments of Tamil Nadu, India and Russia,” said Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa.

Recalling how her government addressed the fears of the local public who rose in protest, Jaya said the successful commissioning of the project is an object lesson on how the fears and apprehensions of the local population can and should be allayed, “through a process of engagement and reassurance, and by building community assets and infrastructure."

She expressed confidence that the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited will maintain the highest safety standards.

Jaya also urged the leaders to hasten the commissioning of the second unit, “considering the needs of our fast growing economy and the needs of our industrial and agricultural sectors”.

The function was organised over video conference between the three leaders in their respective capitals and the fourth point will be at the plant site in Tirunelveli, top officials at KKNPP told Express. The chairman and managing director of Nuclear Power Corporation of India and site director RS Sundar, among others, were also present during the function.

Speaking to Express in the midst of making arrangements for the event, Sundar, a man from Tirunelveli who was appointed the site director, said the Unit 1 was now generating 1,000 MWe of power. “The second unit, which achieved criticality a month ago, will begin power production by month end,” he said.

The complex is en route to becoming the biggest such in the country — the framework agreement for units 5 and 6 will reportedly be ready by the end of the year. “Excavation work is now going on for units 3 and 4,” he added.

Police sources said they had not deployed any additional forces, but intelligence agencies are monitoring the protesters.

This is a major milestone for the project that has been beset with troubles of various kinds over the years: soon after the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev signed the Inter-Governmental deal in 1988, it was stuck in the international and domestic political developments in both countries.

The governments led by Deve Gowda and Boris Yeltsin revived it in 1998, and the contract was signed by the ones headed by Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Putin in 2002. The civil work began almost immediately.

There were other setbacks as well, including the death of project director Sunil Kumar Agarwal due to illness, and that of Sergei Ryzhov, chief designer of the plant’s light water VVER reactor, in a plane crash in 2011.

But the biggest challenge it faced was when people from the coastal villages that surrounded the plant rose in protest against setting the complex. They were alarmed after reports began coming in about radiation contamination, when a nuclear power plant in Fukushima, Japan was flooded following tsunami.

The activists, whose campaigns were rather passive till then, quickly captured the opportunity to raise a massive and well-organised protest in the second half of 2011. It was not enough to stop the project, but they managed to slow it down and also raised a series of questions about the liability clause, an important but seldom discussed aspect till then.

The protest has finally turned docile over years, and the cost of the project went up from Rs 13,171 crore to around Rs 22, 000 crore.


Pakistan Ups Security On Taliban Attack Threat At Border Points With India

$
0
0

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has stepped up security after a terror alert warned of possible Taliban attack at border crossing points with India on the country's Independence Day on August 14, officials said today.

The Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) of Punjab province has sent a memo to the chief secretary that Taliban were planning to target Wagah or Ganda Sindh border crossings between August 13 and 15.

It claimed that two suicide bombers had been tasked by Mualana Fazlullah, the fugitive chief of Taliban who is hiding in Afghanistan, to attack Independence Day parade at the border points.

"Extreme vigilance and heightened security measures are suggested to avoid any untoward incident," the CTD said.

Both crossings are close to Lahore.

In 2014, at least 55 people, including children and security personnel, were killed and about 200 others injured in a suicide blast at Wagah.

An official of home department said that security has already been increased after a suicide bombing at a hospital in Quetta on August 8 in which 74 people were killed around 72 people were injured.

"We take special security measures for the Independence Day and all alerts and suggestion by the intelligence agencies are considered and security have been provided at relevant points," he said.

Source>>

Indian Market Less Accessible To Israel’s Defense Industries

$
0
0
Israeli Armed Heron Drone
by Arie Egozi

The Indian market has become less accessible to the Israeli defense industries. The Indian demand to transfer manufacturing to Indian companies causes a situation in which states like the US are gaining control over complete defense technology sectors, in certain fields.

The Indian market with its huge potential has become more and more complicated for the Israeli defense industries, whose ability to transfer technologies has been very limited.

A Defense Ministry source said yesterday that Israel must examine its policy considering defense technology export to countries such as India, otherwise the “situation might only get worse”, he said.

Meanwhile, Lockheed Martin has been in discussion with the US government and the government of India in regard to the shifting of the F-16 fighter aircraft assembly line to India. Will the company transfer four crucial technologies which was denied to South Korea, a close US ally, for the KF-X program?

In exchange for a large order of F-16 fighter aircraft from the Indian Air Force (IAF), Lockheed Martin is offering to close its only assembly line in Fort Worth, USA and relocate it to India.

According to Defense World, the question is will the Pentagon allow the of transfer of the following technologies to India:

integrated systems for active electronically scanned array radar
electro-optical targeting pod
infrared search and track
radio frequency jammer

These technologies form an important component of the F-16V fighter jet, the latest evolution of the world’s most successful war plane that has been offered to New Delhi.

US had denied parting with the four technologies citing national technology protection policy. Lockheed Martin spokesperson was quoted as saying by that the company was “offering India the exclusive opportunity to produce, operate and export F-16 Block 70 aircraft. He added that “the production of the F-16 will continue in Fort Worth with current contract work through late 2017,” forecasting that as Fort Worth F-16 production deliveries are completed, F-16 mechanics will transition to the F-35 production line.


Pakistan Rejects India's Claim of Cross-Border Infiltration

$
0
0

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has rejected India's charge of infiltration in Kashmir, after its envoy Abdul Basit was summoned and handed over a "strong demarche" over Pakistan's continued support to cross-border terrorism.

"We strongly reject Indian claim of any cross-LOC infiltration. Pakistan remains committed to the policy of not allowing its territory for any terrorist activity against anyone," the Foreign Office said in statement last night when asked about India summoning the Pakistani High Commissioner.

It said that it is necessary to establish "veracity of the Indian claim".

"Details in this regard will be gathered," it said.

Amid growing strain in ties, India yesterday summoned Basit and handed him a "strong demarche" over Pakistan's continued support to cross-border terrorism by pushing in trained terrorists to carry out attacks, particularly in Kashmir.

Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar called Basit to his South Block office and lodged a strong protest over the issue as he made a specific reference to LeT terrorist and Pakistani national Bahadur Ali, who was captured recently in North Kashmir during an encounter.

Ali, born in the Zia Bagga village of Lahore, was arrested by Indian authorities in Jammu and Kashmir on July 25 with weapons (AK 47 rifle, live rounds, grenades, grenade launcher etc) as also sophisticated communication equipment and other material of Pakistani/ international origin, according to the demarche issued to Basit.

The ties between India and Pakistan have seen growing bitterness after Pakistan and its Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif made provocative statements on the Kashmir situation in the wake of killing of Hizbul Mujahideen commander Burhan Wani in an encounter with the security forces on July 8.



Pakistan Army Helping LeT Spread Unrest In Kashmir: NIA

$
0
0

Watch Bahadur Ali's Confession: Terrorist Bahadur Ali, who was arrested by Indian authorities in J&K on July 25 ’16, made all his disclosure on camera


The National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Wednesday revealed that LeT terrorist and Pakistani national Bahadur Ali, who was captured recently in North Kashmir, was regularly guided by the control room of terrorist groups in PoK with the help of Pakistani forces.

The agency, which is probing the role of LeT in the present unrest in Kashmir Valley which has come up after the killing of Hizbul Mujahideen terrorist Burhan Wani, also said that the arms and ammunitions training given to Bahadur Ali show the involvement of military experts.

“We have collected all kinds of evidences. Bahadur Ali was directed to take advantage of current situation in Kashmir. Recovered articles show that terrorist was provided great refs in codes. It shows very highly trained people trained him,” said NIA IG Sanjeev Kumar in a press conference.

Kumar disclosed that Bahadur Ali was recruited by Jamaat-ud-Dawa and was subsequently radicalised by LeT. “Bahadur Ali said that there were 30-50 trainees at training camps of LeT from different parts of the countries including Afghanistan and Pak. He said that there were a few army officers in civilian clothes who checked their preparedness with a check-list,” said Kumar adding that Bahadur Ali crossed into Indian side on either 11th or 12th June along with two LeT cadres.

Bahadur Ali, who was arrested by Indian authorities in J&K on July 25 ’16, made all his disclosure on camera.

US Favors India's Military Support To Afghanistan: Gen John Nicholson

$
0
0
Ashraf Ghani having failed by his dramatic shift in foreign policy to appease Islamabad, learnt the hard way of the true nature of  India's historical and strategic partnership with Afghanistan

NEW DELHI: Afghanistan has sought more military supplies from India including attack helicopters and US favours Indian support in enhancing Afghan security forces, a top American commander overseeing US operations in the war-ravaged country said today.

India has already provided four Mi-25 helicopters to Afghanistan and US Commander General John Nicholson said the country needs more military aircraft to deal with Taliban and various other terror outfits.

Welcoming India's contribution to restoring peace and stability in Afghanistan, Nicholson said terror outfits like Haqqani network, Lashkar-e- Toiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad are not only a threat to Afghanistan but to the region including India.

Nominated Commander of NATO Forces in Afghanistan Gen John "Mick" Nicholson

Nicholson, who heads the US operations in Afghanistan, on his second visit here has met National Security Adviser Ajit Doval, Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar and Defence Secretary G Mohan Kumar and discussed a range of issues including situation in Afghanistan and terror threats to the region.

The US Commander said military training by India to thousands of Afghan security personnel has helped that country significantly which is in tune with the objective of the NATO and the US.

"I cannot speak for the Afghan government. But I know that they have requested more and would like more and I think there is an immediate need for more as these aircraft can immediately get into the fight," he said, when asked whether Afghanistan was seeking more military helicopters from India apart from the four Mi 25 choppers.

He said Afghanistan was struggling to get spare parts for Russian aircraft due to Western sanctions against Moscow and India can supply them, adding "the US favours India's military support to Afghanistan".

Referring to Pakistan, he said the Taliban "enjoys sanctuaries" in Pakistan and that the US has asked Islamabad to take steps to contain the terror networks operating from its soil.

"We consistently encourage Pakistan to take action against terrorist groups that operate from its territory and close down their safe havens," he told a group of journalists, at the same time, adding that the US was supportive of Islamabad's efforts to reduce the ability of militants groups.

Nicholson said the US was trying to build a "counter terrorism platform" focusing on containing all terror groups emanating from the region and ensure its peace and stability.

Hailing India's contribution in reconstruction of Afghanistan, he said the Afghan-India Friendship Dam in Herat province and Chabahar port project will help boost Afghanistan's economy.

The US Commander yesterday visited the burial sites of one of his ancestors -- Brigadier Gen John Nicholson -- in a cemetery in Old Delhi. "My wife and I cleaned his grave," he said.


IDN TAKE: Kashmir Valley Unrest: Time To Act Tough

$
0
0

by Brigadier Arun Bajpai 

On the pretext of the killing of the Hijbul Mujahedeen jehadi Burhan Wani on 8 July in the Kashmir valley, the unrest which got started by the Pakistani paid stooges Sayed Ahmed Shah Geelani led separatist with whom Hurriyat Conference also has also made a common cause, has crossed the 30 day mark. These people on orders from Pakistan extended this unrest period to, first 05 Aug so that when Union Home Minister Mr Rajnath Singh reaches Pakistan for the SARRC summit on 4 Aug, this unrest is on and it gives Pakistan a talking point. Now Geelani has extended it to 12 Aug. Be rest assured it will be further extended to 15 Aug to coincide with India’s Independence Day.

Till date, 56 people including police persons have been killed and approximately 5,000 wounded. Among the security forces, 2,000 J&K police personnel and 1,100 CRPF jawans have also been injured by the stone pelting crowd, some of them seriously. This crowd of pattharbaj have attacked several police stations, burned some down and looted scores of automatic weapons. They even tried to attack military camps. Worst is that these separatists are now naming police and administrative officers of J&K by name threatening to kill them and their families. Some houses of the police men have been burnt. Posters have come up in the valley at so many places that these police people should leave their services within 15 days or else their families will bear the consequences. Needless to say all this is designed to break the morale of the J&K police loyal to the government. Even the ruling PDP party minsters are not spared and are being intimidated. As for the J&K state CM Mehbooba Mufti is concerned, she already appears to have abdicated her authority. Instead of taking strict action against trouble makers she has met Home Minster Raj Nath Singh and wants Central Government to talk to separatists and also Pakistan. Even some leading news paper editorials are advocating the same and the idea of enhancement of autonomy or downgrading of AFSPA.

Talkative that we Indians are we feel that talks and more talks will get us the results. We are still continuing with this talking syndrome since the last 68 years in J&K but what have we achieved in the process? All these activities happen in this state because these separatist know that sooner than later we will cave in and grant them more than what they deserve. We just do not want to understand the real problem. In Kashmir Valley after the genocide on five lakh Kashmiri pandits who were forced to leave their homes in valley, the population there is 99% Muslims. Out of these 90 lakh population, in the four districts adjoining Pakistan border which is composed of Gujjars and Bakkharwals there is no pattaharbaji. Similarly in Shia dominated Kargil and Drass area of valley there is no problem. The unrest is among the 50 lakh Sunni Muslim in central valley who feel that they will be well off in Sunni Pakistan. Surely 125 corer Indian population cannot be dependent on the dictates of 50 lakh people of valley?

Mr Singh the ex home secretary and now a BJP MP is very right when he asked his government to deal; with this unrest strictly. Enough of this kid glove effect. Let Governors rule be declared in J&K and appoint an ex Army officer in J&K as governor. Arrest all these separatist and Hurriyat leaders and ship them out of J&K, they must be charged with sedition under anti national act. Organize central living facilities to all J&K police people where their families should be located. Let there be permanent curfew in the state with shoot at sight orders for anybody breaking it. As for talks with Pakistan surely this is a foolish idea. The main reason for the unrest is because Pakistan has instigated it so what results talks will get us? There was even reports in the media that Geelani was paying the stone pelters Rs. 500 per day for their heinous acts. Besides why should we discuss with Pakistan our internal matters when we say J&K is part of India? Same is the case with talks with the Hurriyat or separatists. When we do not consider them as a third party in the Kashmir dispute so why give them an official status? All these advocates of talks must understand that talks only succeed when we talk from strength and not when the enemy knows that we are hell bent on somehow restoring peace in the Valley.

Brig Arun Bajpai is a distinguished Defence and Strategic Analyst. Views express are his own.

Admin - IDN

Vietnam Moves New Rocket Launchers Into Disputed South China Sea: Reports

$
0
0
Vietnamese Extra rocket fired from a coastal defense site

HONG KONG: Vietnam has discreetly fortified several of its islands in the disputed South China Sea with new mobile rocket launchers capable of striking China's runways and military installations across the vital trade route, according to Western officials.

Diplomats and military officers told Reuters that intelligence shows Hanoi has shipped the launchers from Vietnam into position on five bases in the Spratly islands in recent months, a move likely to raise tensions with Beijing.

The launchers have been hidden from aerial surveillance and they have yet to be armed, but could be made operational with rocket artillery rounds within two or three days, according to the three sources.

Vietnam's Foreign Ministry said the information was "inaccurate", without elaborating.

Deputy Defence Minister, Senior Lieutenant-General Nguyen Chi Vinh, told Reuters in Singapore in June that Hanoi had no such launchers or weapons ready in the Spratlys but reserved the right to take any such measures.

"It is within our legitimate right to self-defence to move any of our weapons to any area at any time within our sovereign territory," he said.

The move is designed to counter China's build-up on its seven reclaimed islands in the Spratlys archipelago. Vietnam's military strategists fear the building of runways, radars and other military installations on those holdings have left Vietnam's southern and island defences increasingly vulnerable.

Military analysts said it was the most significant defensive move Vietnam has made on its holdings in the South China Sea in decades.

Hanoi wanted to have the launchers in place as it expected tensions to rise in the wake of the landmark international court ruling against China in an arbitration case brought by the Philippines, foreign envoys said.

The ruling last month, stridently rejected by Beijing, found no legal basis to China's sweeping historic claims to much of the South China Sea.

Vietnam, China and Taiwan claim all of the Spratlys while the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei claim some of the area.

"China has indisputable sovereignty over the Spratly islands and nearby waters," China's Foreign Ministry said in a faxed statement on Wednesday. "China resolutely opposes the relevant country illegally occupying parts of China's Spratly islands and reefs and on these illegally occupied Spratly islands and reefs belonging to China carrying out illegal construction and military deployments."

In Washington, US State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau said at a news briefing that the United States is aware of the reports and added: "We continue to call on all South China Sea claimants to avoid actions that build tensions, take practical steps to build confidence and intensify efforts that find peaceful, diplomatic solutions to dispute."

STATE-OF-THE-ART SYSTEM 

Foreign officials and military analysts believe the launchers form part of Vietnam's state-of-art EXTRA rocket artillery system recently acquired from Israel.

EXTRA rounds are highly accurate up to a range of 150 km (93 miles), with different 150 kg (330 lb) warheads that can carry high explosives or bomblets to attack multiple targets simultaneously. Operated with targeting drones, they could strike both ships and land targets.

That puts China's 3,000-metre runways and installations on Subi, Fiery Cross and Mischief Reef within range of many of Vietnam's tightly clustered holdings on 21 islands and reefs.

While Vietnam has larger and longer range Russian coastal defence missiles, the EXTRA is considered highly mobile and effective against amphibious landings. It uses compact radars, so does not require a large operational footprint - also suitable for deployment on islets and reefs.

"When Vietnam acquired the EXTRA system, it was always thought that it would be deployed on the Spratlys...it is the perfect weapon for that," said Siemon Wezeman, a senior arms researcher at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

There is no sign the launchers have been recently test fired or moved.

China took its first Spratlys possessions after a sea battle against Vietnam's then weak navy in 1988. After the battle, Vietnam said 64 soldiers with little protection were killed as they tried to protect a flag on South Johnson reef - an incident still acutely felt in Hanoi.

In recent years, Vietnam has significantly improved its naval capabilities as part of a broader military modernisation, including buying six advanced Kilo submarines from Russia.

Carl Thayer, an expert on Vietnam's military at the Australian Defence Force Academy, said the deployment showed the seriousness of Vietnam's determination to militarily deter China as far as possible.

"China's runways and military installations in the Spratlys are a direct challenge to Vietnam, particularly in their southern waters and skies, and they are showing they are prepared to respond to that threat," he said. "China is unlikely to see this as purely defensive, and it could mark a new stage of militarisation of the Spratlys."

Trevor Hollingsbee, a former naval intelligence analyst with the British defence ministry, said he believed the deployment also had a political factor, partly undermining the fear created by the prospect of large Chinese bases deep in maritime Southeast Asia.

"It introduces a potential vulnerability where they was none before - it is a sudden new complication in an arena that China was dominating," he said.


Tweak In Rules Now Permits Export of Small Arms From India With Due Permission

$
0
0

NEW DELHI: Top small arms manufacturers from across the globe are looking to set up shop in India with a critical tweak in rules by the government that has enabled the private sector to set up manufacturing units and even cater to export orders after due permissions.

The revised Arms Rules 2016, which have been notified by the government last month, have brought clarity to the sector, giving clear rules on how private players can set up shop, bring in foreign investment and sell small arms.

Till now, only state owned public sector units were manufacturing arms for the Indian forces. With a massive requirement stretching across the three armed forces, paramilitary forces and state police, a large quantity of small arms like rifles, carbines and side arms were being imported annually.

"These revised rules will disperse the clouds of ambiguity that had engulfed the Small Arms and ammunition manufacturing sector thereby enabling the private sector to not only help meet domestic demand but enter the regional export market in a significant manner," says Ankur Gupta, Vice President at EY India.

In a recent tweak in FDI rules, the government for the first time brought in small arms under the defence ambit. This has opened the way for an automatic route for FDI investments up to 49 per cent in the sector.

Industry insiders say that several top manufacturers, like Colt, Heckler and Kotch and IWI are in advanced talks with Indian players to set up facilities after the recent tweak. As per the notified rules, Indian companies will be granted a seven year license after due vetting and will be allowed to set up units in special economic zones. No facility will be allowed to come up near border areas.

The arms manufactured will also be "allowed for export subject to the approval of the Ministry of Home Affairs in consultation with the Ministry of External Affairs, Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Commerce, on a case to case basis". While industry experts have welcomed the move, they have cautioned that some processes will need to be smoothened out to encourage manufacturing.

"On the flip side, the licensing process is under the MHA and approvals are required even for importing machinery. This will take time to evolve and companies could face delays in the short term," Gupta said.


Lankan Cabinet Approves Sirisena's Proposal To Buy Fighter Planes

$
0
0

COLOMBO: The Sri Lankan Cabinet has approved a proposal by President Maithripala Sirisena to purchase new multirole fighter aircraft and associated weapons for the Sri Lanka Air Force (SLAF), Cabinet spokesman Rajitha Senaratne announced on Wednesday.

India and Pakistan are likely to bid for the supply with India offering its indigenously madee Tejas Light Combat Aircraft, and Pakistan offering the JF-17 Thunder fighter which it is making in collaboration with China.

The Sri Lankan cabinet spokesman said that the government will call for expressions of interest for the purchase of around 8-12 fighter jets. The fighter aircraft of the SLAF have been aging and it is important to upgrade the equipment to maintain security and be prepared for any unexpected threat, he explained.

The cabinet approved a proposal by President Sirisena, in his capacity as the Minister of Defense, to obtain expressions of interest from interested aircraft manufacturers, assistant manufacturers, and authorized government agents. The deal will be on a government to government basis.

The speculation is that during his recent visit to Sri Lanka, the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) chief, Air Chief Marshal Sohail Aman, might have pushed the case of the F-17 Thunder fighter aircraft which Pakistan is producing in collaboration with China.

A serious attempt was made by Pakistan in late 2015 and early 2016 to sell the JF-17s to Sri Lanka in a US$ 400 million deal financed by Pakistan. But the attempt failed because India stood in the way through diplomatic action, as it considered Sri Lanka to be within its areas of influence in strategic terms.

Given the deteriorating relations between India and Pakistan as a result of the month-long violent agitation in Kashmir which Pakistan is openly exploiting to push its agenda, it is very likely that India will be concerned if there are renewed efforts by the Sri Lankans and Pakistanis to strike a deal over the F-17s.

However, Sri Lanka’s Defense Secretary Karunasena Hettiarachchi said in an interview recently, that no decision had been taken on which aircraft to buy and from which country. At any rate, any purchase would be done after floating a tender and calling for bids as per standard government procedure, he added.

In 2015 and early 2016, India had no alternative to offer because its indigenously produced Light Combat Aircraft Tejas was still being developed. However, Sri Lanka’s state owned Sunday Observer carried a story quoting Sri Lankan Air Force commander, Air Marshal Gagan Bulathsinghala, as saying that India had offered Tejas as an alternative. Subsequently, the Air Force spokesman denied the Sunday Observer story.

But India can offer Tejas now, as it has been test flown successfully and some aircraft are to join the Indian Air Force soon.


No Trajectory Correction In January 2017 Could Cripple Mangalyaan: ISRO Chief

$
0
0

A long duration eclipse, scheduled to occur in January 2017, could cripple ISRO’s Mangalyaan mission if a timely course correction is not initiated, said ISRO chairman AS Kiran Kumar while addressing students at Indian Institute of Technology-Gandhinagar (IIT-Gn) on Wednesday.

“While this mission was meant to last for six months, this September 24 we will be completing two years and we still have enough fuel for the five payloads working on it to last many more years. We have one activity, which we will be doing in January of next year, when the long duration eclipse period could cripple the satellite if no corrections are done,” said Kiran Kumar while delivering a lecture on “Space Technology — Contribution to India’s Development”.

“The batteries on the satellite cannot support long duration eclipse and we are going to change the trajectory of the satellite so that the eclipse duration comes down. And once that is done the satellite can last many more years and we can study multiple seasons and activities on Mars,” he added.

The eclipse of Mars is expected to happen in the first half of January will last 7-8 hours. By changing the trajectory, ISRO expects to cut down the duration of the eclipse by half.

Though Mangalyaan is close to spending two years in the Martian orbit, it still contains about 30 kilograms of fuel, the ISRO chief said. The Mars Orbiter Mission was launched in November 5, 2013 from Sriharikota, Andhra Pradesh. After a 298-day transit it was inserted into the Mars’ orbit on September 24, 2014 from where it has been busy clicking pictures and collected data of the Martian atmosphere.

The MOM has already functioned a couple of very crucial maneuver which included changing the orbit on October 2014, when Comet Siding Spring flew past the red planet. Similarly, a 15-day communication black out occurred in June 2015, when the MoM went behind the Sun and remained incommunicado.

According to KIran Kumar, ISRO would be launching a geostationary weather satellite INSAT-3DR in a month’s time. He said that India currently has about 34 satellites providing communication data. “We need many more. We need to practically double it by 2020,” Kiran Kumar later told media persons.



Brinkmanship Renewed: The Current Phase of U.S.-Pakistani Relations

$
0
0

by Ijaz Khan 

It is clear that relations between Pakistan and the United States are deteriorating once again. The May 2016 drone strike that killed Mullah Mansour in Balochistan ushered in another round of questions about the life expectancy of the bilateral relationship amid harder bargaining and brinkmanship between the two countries. These relations have been zigzagging from high to low for a long time. Both states have managed to avoid complete breakdown since resuscitating the relationship after 9/11. Even if the United States and Pakistan are able to avoid a complete breakdown, it will only postpone the reckoning for a future date. Neither side has given any indication of making a fundamental change in its approach to the other or on the policies and actions over which the two countries disagree.

A History of Mistrust

Pakistani-U.S. relations have always been based mainly on opposition to other actors rather than trust and commonality of long-term goals and interests. Throughout the Cold War, the on-again, off-again alliance was against the Soviet Union, though Pakistan used it to balance against India. This trend has continued and arguably gotten worse in the post-9/11 era. The relationship has most frequently been referred to tactical or transactional. Both side have managed their bilateral relations rather well considering the mutual suspicions, mistrust, and divergence of views on the region and on the purpose and scope of counterterrorism cooperation. Pakistani decision-makers look with suspicion at growing U.S. relations with India and view this relationship through the zero-sum dynamics of the region. America’s policy of keeping its relations with Pakistan separate from its relations with India is neither understood nor accepted in the Pakistani establishment.

Pakistan has always feared being sandwiched between two hostile states: India to the east and Afghanistan to the west. As a result, its Afghan policy has always been driven in part by the desire to keep India out of Afghanistan. The Taliban era is the only time in modern history when Pakistan managed to accomplish this objective. Pakistani decision-makers believe that the U.S./NATO presence in Afghanistan has facilitated Indian influence in Afghanistan and view the U.S. targeting of the Taliban through this prism. Pakistan thus finds it difficult to give up totally on the Afghan Taliban, though fears of a domestic backlash are also relevant. This reluctance feeds U.S. mistrust of Pakistan, to say the least.

In U.S. foreign policy circles, there is an ongoing debate whether to continue partnering with Pakistan or give up on it. The view from Pakistan is that those who argue for dumping the relationship gained strength after the Taliban took control of Kunduz. It was retaken only with active U.S. military support and the whole affair probably contributed to the decision by the United States to abandon its planned 2016 complete withdrawal from Afghanistan. This incident must be viewed within the context of ongoing U.S. anger over Pakistani support for the Haqqani network and frustration about Pakistan’s failure to deliver on a peace settlement in Afghanistan. After Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and the United States banked on Pakistan’s cooperation to deliver the Taliban, the continued Taliban offensive and the Quadrilateral Group’s failure to make any breakthroughs in negotiations have led the United States and Afghanistan to give up any hope for a settlement in the near term.

Mounting Tensions All Around

The targeting killed of Mullah Mansour followed two other points of friction: the U.S. refusal to subsidize the sale of F-16 fighters and the brief closure of the Torkham border in response to armed skirmishes. Although the skirmishes and border closing are technically a matter between Pakistan and Afghanistan, these incidents have direct bearing on Pakistan’s role in counterterrorism. The United States also cares about bilateral relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan, because improved relations are necessary for reducing violence and ultimately reaching a peace settlement. The refusal by the U.S. Congress to subsidize the sale of F-16s after others in the government promised to do so was a sign of U.S. frustration and contributed to tensions. The same is true for decisions to once again condition a portion of U.S. reimbursements on action against the Afghan Taliban, specifically the Haqqani Network.

Then came the drone strike on Mullah Mansour. Independent analysts considered close to the military and government spokesmen saw this as clear evidence that the United States wanted to pressure Pakistan. After announcing an enquiry into how an Afghan got a Pakistan National Identity Card and passport, Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar reiterated the original Foreign Office condemnation of the drone strike as a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty. Sartaj Aziz, a senior advisor to the prime minister, called the United States a selfish friend, and Chief of Army Staff General Raheel Sharif demanded the United States launch drone strikes against the Pakistani Taliban inside Afghanistan. These condemnations and demands should be seen as evidence of tough bargaining by Pakistan intended to blunt U.S. pressure and a sign that Pakistani decision-makers will not budge when it comes to action against the Afghan Taliban or its approach to a peace settlement in Afghanistan.

The question is whether both sides will stop short of total breakdown or control the worsening relations as they did on a number of occasions since 2001. The last glaring example of this tightrope walk was the Salala episode in 2011. In November of that year, U.S. jets bombed a Pakistani guard post, killing 24 Pakistani soldiers and resulting in a serious crisis in bilateral relations. Pakistan refused permission of the use of its territory for NATO supplies to Afghanistan until the United States offered a formal apology. The crisis ended after what I termed then an episode of hard bargaining between the two sides. Although Salala almost caused a full rupture, current conditions may be ripe for an even bigger crisis that would be harder to diffuse.

This is not just a two-player game. Tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan are also mounting. In May, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani withdrew requests for Pakistani assistance on negotiations and instead demanded action against Afghan Taliban. Pakistan for its part sought to pressure Afghanistan by fencing and enforcing their shared border at Torkham, triggering a military confrontation that included cross-border fire and the aforementioned border sealing for a few days. This episode ended with the direct intervention by Gen. Sharif. The return of Afghan territory at Angoor Adda (also directed by Gen. Sharif), an action which could have helped thaw relations, was forgotten amid the tensions.

These tensions grew amid new border management practices initiated by Pakistan at Torkham in June. The new practices entail putting a stop to centuries-old free movement of tribes divided by the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. This traffic increased considerably after 1990, when Afghan refugees started visiting Afghanistan, but not returning completely. Many Afghan men also began going to work in Afghanistan, but kept their families inside Pakistan. A large number of patients also started coming to Peshawar without visas. While Pakistan did not close the Torkham border crossing and had just started implementing normal and legal border crossing, the suddenness of these new actions without any reasonable warning created ill will. The latest round of clashes started when Pakistan began constructing a gate after first refusing entry to anyone without a visa. Pakistani policymakers calculated that pressuring Kabul would result in pressure on Americans.

Differential Leverage

Despite new pressure, Pakistan feels confident the United States will not cross the red line and totally give up on the bilateral relationship. The United States not only needs Pakistan for its Afghanistan and global counterterrorism policies, but it also cannot afford the collapse of Pakistan, a state larger than Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria put together and in possession of nuclear weapons. The collapse of the Pakistani state would create challenges requiring far more resources relative to American engagement in Afghanistan, Iraq, or Syria. Pakistan’s confidence has been beefed up by an increasing Chinese stake in its security as a result of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, which is central to China’s policy covering 60 countries. The caveat in this calculation is that United States and China share concerns about terrorism and Taliban. They also both want a peaceful Afghanistan under the current constitutional dispensation.

Pakistan could have improved its position with support from Russia, which considers the Islamic State a bigger threat than the Taliban. However, Russia is not a comparably sized player to China and the United States in the region. More importantly, Russia would not give up on India for the sake of Pakistan regardless of its concerns about the Islamic State.

Pakistan and the United States appear to be moving to manage bilateral relations without letting go of mutual mistrust. Senator John McCain’s (R-AZ) visited Islamabad just after Gen. Sharif’s statement about not permitting Pakistani soil to be used against Afghanistan, which was followed by a U.S. airstrike against a Pakistani-wanted terrorist. The U.S. Congressional hearing that asked “Pakistan, friend or foe?” strengthened the argument inside the United States to be stricter with Pakistan and not just postpone the breakdown if Pakistan does not relent. The blocking of $300 million of Coalition Support Funds in response to Pakistan’s inaction against the Haqqanni network is a further message of U.S. resolve to make Pakistan change its policy.

The crisis in U.S.-Pakistani bilateral relations has up till now been postponed, but never resolved. Both sides are calling each other’s bluff without wanting a complete breakdown of relations. The United States has to calculate which course of action costs more; staying engaged in Afghanistan and relying on Pakistan help while using sticks and carrots to increase Pakistani cooperation, or giving up on Pakistan and trying to find other alternatives. Pakistan continues to bank on the United States’ believing that giving up is too risky. In this diplomatic brinksmanship or bargaining, if the United States backs down, the two sides will continue postponing rather than resolving their issues. Life will go on until the next such stalemate, though each stalemate will be more serious than its predecessor. At some point, the relationship will break down with far more serious consequences for all. If Pakistan backed down on its policy of not acting against the Afghan Taliban, this would change the entire dynamics of the region. Pakistan has not given any indication it is willing to consider this course. Instead, like the United States, it is trying to manage the relationship as best as possible and postpone the impending crisis rather than resolving the factors that will trigger it.

Ijaz Khan is a Professor of International Relations at University of Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Tejas Touchdown: For Capt Anand It Was Home Landing

$
0
0

BHOPAL: Scores of people thronged Bhopal's old airport as India's first indigenous light combat aircraft (LCA) Tejas landed on Wednesday afternoon, though only a select few got the opportunity to catch a close glimpse. 

Incidentally, the city's old airport has been termed as one of the most suitable domestic airports in the country for landing light combat aircraft Tejas.

Group captain and pilot SK Anand, who belongs to Bhopal, reached the state capital with the fighter aircraft and took off for Pathankot in the evening. The fighter aircraft took off from Bangalore in the morning and reached Bhopal after one and a half hour journey. Talking to media, Anand said, "It was a fantastic journey. It was a good experience to come to Bhopal." His family members also reached the airport to meet him. Vijay Patel, technical team head, accompanied him.

For past one month, preparations were on for landing of Tejas at the old airport. When contacted, airport director Akashdeep Mathur said, "I cannot comment much on this. The crew was completely satisfied with the airport and other logistic support provided to them." Sources said the old airport was chosen deliberately to land the fighter plane owing to the absence of traffic.

After the construction of Raja Bhoj Airport, the old airport was shut down for domestic services.

Wing commander Rajiv Joshi, the other team member, said: "Tejas can carry air-to-air and air-to-surface weapons. The new squadron will get a total of 18 aircrafts including four trainers by 2018." Tejas jets, developed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), are said to be the smallest and lightest supersonic fighter aircraft of their class.

People flocked to the airport after Tejas landed there. However, a select group was allowed to enter the airport and see it closely. The single-seat fighter is considered superior to counterparts like the JF-17 aircraft built jointly by China and Pakistan. Tejas has had no accident in 3,000 hours of flying and its use of composites helps lower its radar signature, making it harder to detect early.


DROP TRIALS of BRAHMOS Missile From Sukhoi-30 in Pokhran From Aug 24

$
0
0

JODHPUR: Drop trials for the formidable supersonic cruise missile system BrahMos from Su-30 MKI aircraft of the Indian Air Force (IAF) are slated from August 24-26 at the Pokhran firing range in Jaisalmer. These drop trials will pave way for the real fire of BrahMos from the Russian made Su-30 by November last week or December first week. In fact, drop trials shall be conducted against land target and a sea target by the month end.

Dr Sudhir Kumar Mishra CEO and MD, BrahMos Aerospace while speaking to TOI said that the drop trials for the air version of BrahMos would be carried with a Mass Dimensional Dummy missile which means that it will be similar to the real missile in terms of weight etc, but would not have any engine and explosives.

"Under rare circumstances due to factors like range requirement or weather, the land trials may also be conducted at Integrated Test Range at Chandipur off the Odisha coast," said the BrahMos chief adding that these drop trials will check the release mechanism of the launcher in addition to assessing the clearance from the aircraft after the fire.

It was on June 25 that BrahMos Aerospace successfully demonstrated the integration flight of the supersonic cruise missile BrahMos on Su30MKI frontline strike fighter of the IAF at HAL Nasik. Success of drop trials would give a major fillip to the BrahMos air-launched flight test program.

"And with that happening, the BrahMos air version programme would further inch closer towards actual test firing when a 2.5-ton BrahMos air-toground missile will be fired from the Sukhoi-30 in November or December," said Dr Mishra

BrahMos and Indian Air Force

While the first squadron of IAF equipped with BrahMos is expected to be operational by April 2017 ambitious plans are in pipeline for raising three squadrons of BrahMos. IAF would become the elite air force in the world to be in possession of a supersonic cruise missile on a long range aircraft, the powerful missile will enable the IAF penetrate deep inside the enemy territory to deliver a deadly blow to their vital installations from sta to their vital installations from stand-off ranges. The integration brings a paradigm shift in the capability of the IAF vis-a-vis its adversaries. The Su-30-BrahMos combination will carry out air combat operations within and beyond visibility range and will provide the IAF with the capability of attacking targets protected by powerful air defence assets. Air version of BrahMos is 500 kgs lighter than its army and naval versions and has tail fins and other required aerodynamic features.

BrahMos and Army

The Indian Army which has already inducted three regiments of BrahMos in its arsenal has now got a nod for the fourth regiment to be equipped with steep dive BrahMos along Indo-China border in the North East. So far, all army regiments are equipped with Block-III version of missile, which was recently tested on May 8 and 9 in 2015. The land-attack version of BrahMos has been operationalised in the Indian Army since 2007. The BrahMos has the capability to take on surface-based targets by flying a combined hi-lo trajectory, thus evading enemy air defence systems. Inclusion of the powerful weapon system in Indian Army has given it a distinct operational advantage to knock down any enemy target even in the most difficult and hidden terrains.


Another Bomb Blast In Pakistan's Quetta, 14 Injured

$
0
0

QUETTA: Pakistani officials say a roadside bomb has gone off near a vehicle escorting a judge in the country's southwest and 14 people were wounded.

Sarfraz Bugti, the head of the interior ministry in southwestern Baluchistan province, says the judge was unharmed in Thursday's explosion, which took place on a main road in the city of Quetta.

Police spokesman Shahzada Farhat says police officers and passers-by were wounded.

No one immediately claimed responsibility for the bombing, which comes just four days after a suicide bomber struck a hospital in Quetta, killing 70 people, mostly lawyers.

That attack took place shortly after a prominent lawyer was gunned down earlier in the day and his body was brought to the hospital.

Quetta is the capital of Baluchistan province.


LeT Terrorist Bahadur Ali Got Radicalized Watching Videos of Asiya Andrabi

$
0
0

NEW DELHI: Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist Bahadur Ali alias Saifullah, a 21-year-old man from Zia Bagga village of Raiwind, Lahore, was radicalized and motivated to undertake jihad against India, after watching videos of Kashmiri separatist Asiya Andrabi, head of all-female group Dukhtaran-e-Millat among other anti-India propagandists. Andrabi has been arrested in the past on several occasions for inciting violence and waging war against India. She openly waved Pakistani flags last year and even appeared in a video slaughtering a cow defying the beef ban.

Working with Hafiz Saeed-led Jamaat-ud-Dawa since 2008, when he was just 14-year-old, Ali also used to listen to taqreers (lectures) of Maulvi Yusuf Asroori of JuD and Maulvi Khalid based in Pakistan, who undertake propaganda against India. He has also met second in command of JuD - Abdul Rehman Makki once, said NIA sources. Trained for waging war against India, Bahadur Ali "started crying" while he was hiding in jungles in the valley and "wanted to go back home".

LeT command centre in PoK - Alpha 3, headed by Saeed's son-in-law Khalid Waleed, asked him to stay put and even 'scolded him'. After infiltrating into Kashmir around June 12-13 along with two others, Saad and Darda, he got separated and remained alone inside the jungle for about a month before he was arrested on July 25.

"We reached a village known as Vadar in India on 6th or 7th day (June 20 or 21).On third day, Saad and Darda got trapped in the gunfire when they went to take food from the village. I remained alone in the jungle and constantly changed my location. I contacted Alpha -3 and requested them to allow me to come back," Ali says.

LeT handlers had given the terrorists eight grid reference codes to reach the destinations. At one of the locations, he was supposed to get food. "Alpha 3 gave me new GR code from where I was to get the food items which were supposedly dumped there. When I reached there, I couldn't find it. I contacted Alpha-3 again and requested them to arrange food and logistics. They assured me of assistance but I couldn't receive any," he further states.

He then moved to a village, Mokam, where he met four persons who belonged to Lashkar. "One of them has visited Pakistan thrice to meet LeT operations commander Abu Muslim Tunda in Muzaffarabad," said Ali. Ali was then asked to attack an Indian Army Brigadier who used to visit the area.

Using a Kashmiri's mobile there in the village, Bahadur Ali was also made to talk to Saeed's son-in-law Khalid Waleed in Pakistan. "It was probably a WhatsApp call. I started crying while speaking when Waleed scolded me. He said a man would give me SIM and mobile but it never reached me," Ali said.

Belonging to Meo caste and son of a police constable in Punjab police (Pakistan), Ali is eighth among nine siblings in the family .His two brothers - Asgar and Imdad Ali also work for JuD in their village.

He worked as a 'Jihad funds collector' for JuD in his initial days but got employed in Falah-e-Insaniyat Foundation (FIF) in Lahore in 2013-14, a front NGO of Lashkar-e-Taiba, before formally joining LeT training.


Viewing all 86928 articles
Browse latest View live